Showing posts with label Alyosha. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alyosha. Show all posts

Friday, November 13, 2015

97. TBK. Bk XI. 3.


Jump to Introduction & Chronology
Jump back to Previous: The Brothers K. Bk X. 5-6. & "This Dog's Life"


Today there were a series of terrorist acts in Paris so I was thinking I would skip publishing anything. Who wants to read about an over-a-century-old novel when everyday life is suddenly so real and horrid. But this chapter is so appropriate to a discussion of evil that I took it as a sign. I don't understand Lise, anymore than I understand the people who attacked random people in Paris; but I believe there is something to understand here.


The Brothers Karamazov

Book XI. 3.
p671 [Lise to Alyosha] “I want to tell you of a longing I have. I would like someone to torture me, marry me and then torture me, deceive me and go away. I don’t want to be happy.”

“You are in love with disorder?”

“Yes, I want disorder. I keep wanting to set fire to the house. I keep imagining how I’ll creep up and set fire to the house secretly. They’ll try to put it out, but it’ll go on burning. And I will know and say nothing. Oh, what silliness! And how bored I am!”

What is this with wanting to set houses on fire? Did Muriel Barbery have this in mind with Paloma? 


She waved her hand with a look of repulsion.

“It’s your luxurious life,” said Alyosha softly.

“Is it better then to be poor?”

“Yes, it is better.”

“That’s what your monk taught you. That’s not true. Let me be rich and all the rest poor. I’ll eat cake and drink cream and I won’t give any to anyone else. Oh, don’t speak, don’t say anything,” she shook her hand at him, although Alyosha had not opened his mouth. “You’ve told me all that before, I know it all by heart. It bores me. If I am ever poor, I will murder somebody, and even if I am rich, I may murder someone, perhaps -- why do nothing! But do you know, I would like to reap. Cut the rye? I’ll marry you, and you will become a peasant, a real peasant; we’ll keep a colt, won’t we? [This could be a reference to Levin in Anna Karenina]  Do you know Kalganov?”

p672 “Yes.”

“He is always wandering about, dreaming. He says, why live in real life, it’s better to dream. One can dream the most delightful things, but real life is a bore. But he’ll be married soon, he’s been making love to me. Can you spin tops?”

“Yes.”

“Well, he’s just like a top; he wants to be wound up and set spinning and then to be lashed, lashed, lashed with a whip. If I marry him, I’ll keep him spinning all his life. You are not ashamed to be with me?”

“No.” [Alyosha has turned into the only monosyllabic character in Russian literature.]

“You are awfully cross, because I don’t talk about holy things. I don’t want to be holy. What will they do to one in the next world for the greatest sin? You must know all about that.”

“God will censure you.” Alyosha was watching her steadily.

“That’s just what I would like. I would go up and they would censure me and I would burst out laughing in their faces. . . . I would like to set fire to the house, Alyosha, to our house. You still don’t believe me?”

“Why? There are children twelve years old, who have a longing to set fire to something and they do set things on fire. It’s a sort of disease.” [This is the attitude Foucault reacted against. Calling something a disease is a way of trivializing it. Though of course if you are living with someone who wants to set the place on fire you just want a cure, not a deeper insight into her psyche or even the spirit of the times.]

“That’s not true, that’s not true. There may be children, but that’s not what I mean.”

“You take evil for good. It’s a passing crisis. It’s the result of your illness, perhaps.”

“You do despise me! It’s simply that I don’t want to do good, I want to do evil, and it has nothing to do with illness.”

p673 “Why do evil?”

“So that everything will be destroyed. Oh, how nice it would be if everything were destroyed! You know, Alyosha, I sometimes think of doing a lot of harm. I would do it for a long while secretly and then suddenly everyone would find out. Everyone will stand around and point their fingers at me and I will look at them all. That would be awfully nice. Why would it be so nice, Alyosha?”

I almost skipped this entire section with crazy Lise, but there’s really so much here. You can see Lise as representing the hobbled condition of women at this time. The options open to women of the better classes at this time in Russia were not that different from Regency England. Lise could be a literary descendant of Lydia Bennet. Or you could view Lise as representing not just her gender but her class, a precursor to similar characters in The Magic Mountain. And the desire to destroy everything is at the heart of Doctor Faustus


“I don’t know. It’s a craving to destroy something good or, as you say, to set fire to something. It happens sometimes.”

“I not only say it, I will do it.”

“I believe you.”
...
“There are moments when people love crime,” said Alyosha thoughtfully.

“Yes, yes! People love crime. Everyone loves crime, they love it always, not at some ‘moments.’ You know, it’s as though people have made an agreement to lie about it and have lied about it ever since. They all say that they hate evil, but secretly they all love it.” 



Of course here I see my interest in Story: “good” and “evil” are the plot devices that drive the action in fiction and life. And the alternative is indeed boredom. There’s remarkably little sex in this book, and what there is takes place not only off stage but in the past. But there is a murder that fuels the plot. I would be happy with a version of the book without Fyodor’s death, but I doubt that such a book would have been as popular. Would Anna Karenina be “Anna Karenina” if she hadn’t thrown herself under that train? I think not.

...
p674 [Still Lise] “...Oh, I must tell you a funny dream I had. I sometimes dream of devils. It’s night, I am in my room with a candle and suddenly there are devils all over the place, in all the corners, under the table. And they open the doors, there’s a crowd of them behind the doors and they want to come and grab me. And they are just coming, just grabbing me. But I suddenly cross myself and they all draw back, though they don’t go away altogether. They stand at the doors and in the corners, waiting. And suddenly I have a frightful longing to revile God aloud, and so I begin. And then they come crowding back to me, delighted, and grab me again and I cross myself again and they all draw back. It’s awful fun, it takes one’s breath away.”

“I’ve had the same dream, too,” said Alyosha suddenly.
...
“...Is it true? You are not laughing?”

“It’s true.”

Lise seemed extraordinarily impressed and for half a minute she was silent. 
...

I would be impressed, too, if my monkish-sort-of-boyfriend admitted to having the same sex dream. The obverse side to creating God in our own image is creating the Devil out of the part of ourselves we are less proud of. By taking sex away from God, we give it to the Devil, and for Lise and Alyosha and the crazy monk Ferapont the world is suddenly filled with devils, the manifestation of our secret desires. 


p675 [Still Lise] “There’s a book here in which I read about the trial of a man who took a four-year-old child and cut off the fingers from both hands, and then crucified him on the wall, hammered nails into him, and crucified him. And afterwards, when he was tried, he said that the child died quickly, within four hours. That was ‘quickly’! He said the child moaned, kept on moaning and he stood admiring it. That’s nice!”

“Nice?”

“Nice. I sometimes imagine that it was I who crucified him. He would hang there moaning and I would sit opposite him eating pineapple jam. I am awfully fond of pineapple jam. Do you like it?”

Alyosha looked at her in silence. Her pale, sallow face was suddenly contorted, her eyes burned.

There are many ways to look at this passage. I suspect Dostoyevsky would have us see it as a kind of demonic possession, though that leaves open the question what “demonic possession” really amounts to. De Sade would have strong opinions about this, I suspect. And if you go back to the recurring statement that "everything is lawful" in what -- without God -- is a state of nature; then this is no more curious than some of the more loathsome (to us) activities of insects chronicled by Sallie Tisdale. Though the addition of “intention” makes this a bit more loathsome. Perhaps.

I would like to end with that last passage, but the next bit relates to, and is perhaps crucial to, the ongoing story of Ivan which we will return to soon. 


“You know, when I read about that child, I cried all night. I kept thinking of how the little thing cried and moaned (a child of four understands, you know) and all the while the thought of pineapple jam haunted me. In the morning I wrote a letter to a certain person, begging him to come and see me. He came and I told him all about the child and the pineapple jam. All about it, all, and said that it was nice. Then he got up and went away. He was only here five minutes. Did he despise me?... 
...

“Did you send him a letter?”

“Yes.”

“Simply to ask about that, about the child?”

“No, not about that at all. But when he came, I asked him about that at once. He answered, laughed, got up and went away.”
...

p676 “And did he despise me? Did he laugh at me?”

“No, for perhaps he believes in pineapple jam himself. He is very ill now, Lise.” [Ivan]

“Yes, he does believe in it,” Said Lise with flashing eyes.

“He doesn’t despise anyone,” Alyosha went on. “Only he does not believe anyone. If he doesn’t believe in people, of course he does despise them.”

“Then he despises me, me?”

“You, too.”

“Good. When he went out laughing, I felt that it was nice to be despised. The child with fingers cut off is nice and to be despised is nice . . .”

And she laughed in Alyosha’s face, a feverish malicious laugh.

“Do you know, Alyosha, do you know, I would like . . . Alyosha save me!” She suddenly jumped from the invalid chair, rushed to him and grabbed him with both hands. “Save me!” she almost groaned. “Is there anyone in the world I could tell what I’ve told you? I’ve told you the truth, the truth. I will kill myself, because I hate everything! I don’t want to live, because I hate everything... Alyosha, why don’t you love me?” she finished in a frenzy.

“But I do love you!” Answered Alyosha warmly.

“And will you weep over me, will you?”

“Yes.”

“Not because I won’t be your wife, but simply because . . . Thank you! It’s only your tears I want. Everyone else may punish me and trample me under foot...”

So... we get to see this from Alyosha’s Christian perspective and we also get a hint of how it must have seemed to the secular Ivan. I believe we are supposed to see that Alyosha is better prepared to process this without falling into brain fever like Ivan. Though, that doesn’t really work as, I just recalled, we are soon to come to the section from Ivan’s point of view that seems to have been an inspiration for the crucial scene in Doctor Faustus. Hmmm... Ivan is a bit of a Faust character -- though without the bargain with the devil. Ivan is like Goethe’s Faust at the beginning of the poem.

One final note from this section. After Lise sends Alyosha away with a letter for Ivan, she carefully slams the door on her own finger, 


p677 ...Ten seconds later, releasing her finger, she walked softly, slowly to her chair. She sat up straight in it and looked intently at her blackened finger and at the blood that oozed from under the nail.

Her lips were quivering and she kept whispering to herself: “I am a wretch, wretch, wretch, wretch!”

If Lise were a complete invention by Dostoyevsky, we would have to ask what he meant by all this. But I read somewhere that Lise was in fact based on a woman he knew (now I can't find that). I was puzzled by that, what about the character was suggested by this real person, but I’m pretty sure this must be it. There remains the question of how he portrays her -- what he chooses to show us -- but I really do want to know more of the background of this real woman. I’m also reminded of George Gissing’s disastrous relationships with women. What was it with writers in the late 19th century that attracted them to apparently crazy women? Is this an improvement over the love ‘em and leave ‘em Romantic writers like Goethe and Byron? As with Goethe’s Faust, I find myself wishing for a feminist critique of Dostoyevsky and Tolstoy. 


Jump to Next: TBK. Bk XI. 4, 8. & Listening to a Clever Woman

Monday, November 9, 2015

93. TBK. Bk VII. 1-2 & "Market Street"


Jump to Introduction & Chronology
Jump back to Previous: God's Hotel

The Brothers Karamazov

Part Three. Book VII. 1.

Of all the odd incidents in this novel, perhaps the most inexplicable for me is Zossima’s rapid corruption after death. For me, it’s amusing and enlightening in how it shows the fickleness and back-biting of even the most "holy" monks. But what does Dostoyevsky mean by it? I’m only going to repeat a few revealing passages, but, to sum up the situation in a few words, Zossima died and he began to rot in less than a day when it was anticipated he would be immune from such a fate due to his saintliness. 

...
And this was followed by a shower of criticism and blame of Father Zossima. “His teaching was false; he taught that life is a great joy and not a vale of tears,” said some of the more unreasonable. “He followed the fashionable belief, he did not recognize material fire in hell,” others, still more unreasonable, added. “He was not strict in fasting, allowed himself sweet things, ate cherry jam with his tea.... Is it for a monk of strict rule to drink tea?” could be heard among some of the envious. “He sat in pride,” the most malicious declared vindictively... 

What I find interesting in this is how difficult it is to rule a Cargo Cult. The core belief of a Cargo Cult is that if you copy the actions of the people who seemed to command the appearance of cargo ships full of all kinds of wonderful things, then you can command the appearance of your own ships. The problem, of course, is getting the ritual just right. The failure of the ships to appear means that the person in charge doesn’t have the ritual quite right so he becomes disgraced and someone with a “better” idea of the ritual steps in. All religions have this character since what they are promising is something that is paid off in the “next” life. It’s only when they try to promise things in this life or expect some sign of favor -- after death for example -- that they can truly be put to the test. Zossima didn’t fail his expectations (I’m bound to say), but he failed the expectations of the people around him. And what Dostoyevsky shows is how very far from “heaven on earth” people, even particularly religious people, are. Why Dostoyevsky is making my point is what I least understand here. 


Book VII. 2.
 ...
p389 [At this point in the story our strange and mysterious narrator -- sometimes omniscient, sometimes not -- is suddenly all up in our business. Here it is the narrator speaking about Alyosha, who has been stunned by the reversal of fortune suffered by his master,] ...My hero had faith, a faith steady and steadfast, but still I am not going to apologize for him.

...it was not a question of miracles. There was no frivolous and impatient expectation of miracles in Alyosha’s mind... what he saw before all was one figure -- the figure of his beloved elder, the figure of that holy man whom he revered with such adoration. The fact is that all the love that lay concealed in his pure young heart for everyone and everything had, for the past year, been concentrated -- and perhaps wrongly so -- on one being, his beloved elder... But, again it was not miracles he needed but only “the higher justice” which had been in his belief outraged by the blow that had so suddenly and cruelly wounded his heart...
...
p390 ... I will not, however, forget to mention something strange which came for a time to the surface of Alyosha’s mind at this fatal moment. This new something was the harassing impression left by the conversation with Ivan, which now persistently haunted Alyosha...
...
p392 [Alyosha to Rakitin who has come to pester him,] “I am not rebelling against my God. I simply ‘don’t accept His world.’ Alyosha suddenly smiled a forceful smile. [This was Ivan’s line.]
...
[Alyosha accepts some sausage from Rakitin] “What! You’re going to eat it! Why, it’s a regular mutiny with barricades!...
...
[Alyosha accepts Rakitin’s suggestion that they go to visit Grushenka.] “And how glad she will be, how delighted,” he [Rakitin] murmured, but he lapsed into silence again. And indeed it was not to please Grushenka that he was taking Alyosha to her. He was a practical person and never undertook anything without a prospect of gain for himself. His object in this case was twofold: first a revengeful desire to see “the downfall of the righteous,” and Alyosha’s fall “from saint to sinner,” and in the second place he had in view a certain material gain for himself... [Grushenka has promised him 25 rubles if he brings Alyosha to her.]

“So the critical moment has come.” he thought to himself with spite, “and we shall catch it on the hop, for it’s just what we want.” 

Rakitin is like a particularly pathetic Mephisto. (I'm thinking of Adrian's tour guide of Leipzig, who leads him astray to the house of ill repute, in Doctor Faustus.)

Dostoyevsky, in his role as novelist, needs to shake Alyosha up here so he can interact with Grushenka as he wouldn’t normally do. Could Dostoyevsky have dreamed up the quickly rotting elder just for this purpose? I suggest this only because it seems to go against what Dostoyevsky  wants to do as a Christian utopian. If story caused this plot development then it is a perfect example of my view of story as the driving force in the universe. If even Dostoyevsky falls prey to turning against his Christian paragon in the name of story, then story is a mighty force indeed. 



Small Victories 

"Market Street" 
That believing in God is less nonsensical than believing in George W. Bush is a pretty weak argument. She would have done better suggesting that the presidency of Bush 2 proves the existence of the Devil which, ipso facto, confirms the existence of God. (Though Ivan's visitor in Bk XI. 9. rightly calls into question this notion.)

This eagerness to believe in an authority figure (I admit she may have just written this as a joke) or, failing that, an imaginary source of universal solace, is kind of sad. Lamott and I probably agree on the majority of social and political topics but, like a child, she needs a parental deity -- with a plan -- always watching out for and supporting her.

As with The Brothers K. section above (I originally wrote this about VI. 1., the section about Zossima's brother, but it works here, too), this really boils down to an insistence that God exists because we really need him to exist. 

The passage below takes place at the beginning of the Iraq War.


p279 I tried to pray my way out of the fear and hate, but my mind was once again a pinball machine of blame and ridiculousness... And I wondered if I actually even believed in God anymore. It seemed ridiculous, this conviction that I had an invisible partner in life, and that we were all part of a bigger, less punishing and isolated truth. I lay there gnashing my teeth, sure that what you see is what you get. This was it. This earth, this country, here, now, was all there was. This was where all life happened, the up and the down and the plus and the minus and the world of choices and consequences. Not an easy place, but a place full of significance.

I clutched my cat as I used to when my parents fought, a life preserver in cold, deep water.

But then -- a small miracle -- I started to believe in George W. Bush. I really did. In my terror, I wondered whether maybe he was smarter than we thought he was, and had grasped classified intelligence and nuance in a way that was well above my own understanding or of that of our era’s most brilliant thinkers.

p280 Then I thought: Wait -- George Bush? And relief washed over me like gentle surf, because believing in George Bush was so ludicrous that believing in God seems almost rational.

I decided to start from scratch, with a simple prayer: “Hi!” I said.

Someone or something hears. I don’t know much about its nature, only that when I cry out, it hears me and moves closer to me, and I don’t feel so alone. I feel better... [I assume she’s talking about God and not her cat here, but I would have a tiny bit more faith in the cat] ...Saint Augustine said that you have to start your relationship with God all over from the beginning, every day. Yesterday’s faith does not wait for you like a dog with your slippers and the morning paper in its mouth. You seek it, and in seeking it, you find it. During the Renaissance, Fra Giovanni Giocondo wrote:

No heaven can come to us unless our hearts find rest in it today. Take heaven!

No peace lies in the future which is not hidden in this present little instant. Take peace!

...



Jump to Next: TBK. Bk VIII. 3, 6. & "Falling Better"

Thursday, October 22, 2015

75. The Brothers K. Bk 1 and "Trail Ducks"

Jump to Introduction & Chronology
Jump back to Previous: We resume


The Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoyevsky
Signet Classics edition 2007 translated by Constance Garnett

Book I.
p15 ...Ivan was staying in the house of such a father, [Fyodor Karamazov] had been living with him for two months, and they were on the best possible terms.

This last fact was a cause of wonder to many others as well as to me...

I include the above only as a way of introducing the non-omniscient narrator of our story. There will also be an omniscient narrator at times.

p20 ...Peter Miusov, a man very sensitive on the subject of money and bourgeois honesty, pronounced the following judgement after getting to know Alyosha: [the 3rd and youngest Karamazov brother] “Here is perhaps the one man in the world whom you might leave alone without a penny, in the center of an unknown town of a million inhabitants, and he would not come to harm. He would not die of cold and hunger, for he would be fed and sheltered at once; and if he were not, he would find a shelter for himself, and it would cost him no effort or humiliation. And to shelter him would be no burden, but, on the contrary, would probably be looked on as a pleasure.”
...
p25 Some of my readers may imagine that Alyosha was a sickly, ecstatic, poorly developed creature, a pale, consumptive dreamer. On the contrary, he was at this time a well-grown, clear-eyed young man of nineteen, radiant with health. He was handsome, too, graceful, moderately tall, with dark brown hair, with a regular, rather long, oval-shaped face, and wide-set dark gray eyes. He was very thoughtful and very serene.

I shall be told, perhaps, that radiant health is not incompatible with fanaticism and mysticism; but I believe that Alyosha was more of a realist than anyone. Oh! no doubt, in the monastery he fully believed in miracles, but, to my thinking, miracles are never a stumbling-block to the realist. It is not miracles that prompt realists to belief. The genuine realist, if he is an unbeliever, will always find strength and ability to disbelieve in the miraculous, and if he is confronted with a miracle as an irrefutable fact he would rather disbelieve his own senses than admit the fact. Even if he admits it he admits it as a fact of nature till then unrecognized by him. Faith does not, in the realist, spring from the miracle but the miracle from faith. If the realist once believes, then he is bound by his very realism to admit the miraculous also. The Apostle Thomas said that he would not believe till he saw, but when he did see he said: “My Lord and my God!” Was it the miracle that forced him to believe? Most likely not, but he believed solely because he desired to believe and possibly he fully believed in his secret heart even when he said: “I do not believe till I see.”
...

p26 The path Alyosha chose was a path going in the opposite direction, but he chose it with the same thirst for swift achievement. As soon as he reflected seriously he was convinced of the existence of God and immortality, and at once he instinctively said to himself: “I want to live for immortality, and I will accept no compromise.” In the same way, if he had decided that God and immortality did not exist, he would at once have become an atheist and a socialist. For socialism is not merely the labor question, it is before all things the atheistic question, the question of the form taken by atheism today. It is the question of the Tower of Babel built without God, not to mount to Heaven from earth but to set up Heaven on earth...

That last is well put.

p27 ... An elder [at an Orthodox monastery] was one who took your soul, your will, into his soul and his will. When you choose an elder, you renounce your own will and yield it to him in complete submission, complete self-abnegation. This novitiate, this terrible school of abnegation, is undertaken voluntarily, in the hope of self-conquest, of self-mastery, in order, after a life of obedience, to attain perfect freedom, that is, from self: to escape the lot of those who have lived their whole life without finding their true selves in themselves... 

We will return to these ideas in “The Grand Inquisitor” section. This passage also made me think of Ram Dass and his dependence on his guru.

Religion. I'll bet Mann's copy of this is marked up, possibly dogeared and full of notes. It occurs to me that, unlike Dostoyevsky and Tolstoy, Austen and Proust and even Charlotte Bronte say little or nothing about religion.


Small Victories by Anne Lamott
Riverhead Books/Penguin edition 2014

"Trail Ducks"
 p66 Getting found almost always means being lost for a while.

...Here I wanted  to bring my goddamn solace, and all the visiting solace rooms were taken! It so sucked.
...
p67 Then, as is almost always the case, God sent along a minder, who had noticed our distressed milling. It would have been hard not to: we looked like exhausted moose...
...
p68 The garage gave us a taste of normality, which none of us had felt for a while because of all the grief and strangeness. You have to be grateful whenever you get to someplace safe and okay, even if it turns out it wasn’t quite where you were heading. The light you see when people are in the tunnel of deep trouble is domestic flashes of recognition and kitchen comforts, not Blake’s radiance, which would be my preference.
... The sky had shifted again when we stepped outside to the dusk. There were hints of the dying sunset. The three of us stood at the open door, admiring the sky. When you’re in the dark, you have to try to remember that it’s a dance -- dark, light, dark, light, dim...

And of course this is the first religious chapter in Small Victories, though not as religious as the passage about Alyosha's "elder"/guru/saint. But what Dostoyevsky says about people making a choice for belief is seconded here. The circumstances of their lives (alcoholism, mental and physical illness, etc.) could just as reasonably point them in the direction of disbelief. The Opiate of the Masses. It wouldn't make any less sense to me if people worshiped and sought solace from Morris Dancing. In fact that would be quite charming.


Jump to Next: 76. TBK. Bk II & Conspiracy theories